<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LittleBigPlanet 2 rumoured for 2010 release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.criticalgamer.co.uk/2010/03/08/littlebigplanet-2-rumoured-for-2010-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.criticalgamer.co.uk/2010/03/08/littlebigplanet-2-rumoured-for-2010-release/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oni-Samurai</title>
		<link>http://www.criticalgamer.co.uk/2010/03/08/littlebigplanet-2-rumoured-for-2010-release/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Oni-Samurai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.criticalgamer.co.uk/?p=7643#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>Probably a mis-quote or just took what was said out of context deliberately. I&#039;d imagine the source actually said something like &#039;we have enough content to make a sequel&#039; meaning there&#039;s more upcoming dlc.

&amp; what the hell happened to the sackboy sephiroth? they could do a remake of FF7 in LBP form..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably a mis-quote or just took what was said out of context deliberately. I&#8217;d imagine the source actually said something like &#8216;we have enough content to make a sequel&#8217; meaning there&#8217;s more upcoming dlc.</p>
<p>&amp; what the hell happened to the sackboy sephiroth? they could do a remake of FF7 in LBP form..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KrazyFace</title>
		<link>http://www.criticalgamer.co.uk/2010/03/08/littlebigplanet-2-rumoured-for-2010-release/comment-page-1/#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>KrazyFace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.criticalgamer.co.uk/?p=7643#comment-2368</guid>
		<description>I personaly don&#039;t see any point to it myself. LBP has a constant supply of fresh DLC which usually enhances the game and fuels it&#039;s creative ideas for the user, like Danny says, it seems a bit counterproductive to make a seperate &quot;newer&quot; LBP. Everything the creative community needs is already there, and anything that needs a re-haul can be done with either more DLC or an update to the main game.

I&#039;ve seen levels out there that have astounding talent poured into them, and really, it&#039;s now OUR ideas that make LBP the great game it is today. With over a million levels to play through I&#039;d imagine it would take even the biggest LBP fan their entire life just get through what&#039;s on offer at the moment.

In short: ME NO THINK IT NEED IT!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personaly don&#8217;t see any point to it myself. LBP has a constant supply of fresh DLC which usually enhances the game and fuels it&#8217;s creative ideas for the user, like Danny says, it seems a bit counterproductive to make a seperate &#8220;newer&#8221; LBP. Everything the creative community needs is already there, and anything that needs a re-haul can be done with either more DLC or an update to the main game.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen levels out there that have astounding talent poured into them, and really, it&#8217;s now OUR ideas that make LBP the great game it is today. With over a million levels to play through I&#8217;d imagine it would take even the biggest LBP fan their entire life just get through what&#8217;s on offer at the moment.</p>
<p>In short: ME NO THINK IT NEED IT!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

